Councillors Slam Proposed Nightlife Restrictions On Newtown’s Marlborough Hotel

Councillors Slam Proposed Nightlife Restrictions On Newtown’s Marlborough Hotel
Image: The Hotel Marlborough on the corner of King St and Missenden Rd in Newtown. Source: Wikimedia.

Police are seeking to impose facial recognition cameras, alcohol limits and dance floor restrictions at the Marlborough Hotel in Newtown—a move councillors warn could strangle the city’s post lockout nightlife.

The proposal comes just weeks after the Minns government lifted the last lockout laws, giving Sydney’s late-night venues room to revamp late-night trade.

Police say the King Street cornerstone has faced dozens of alcohol-related incidents in recent years, prompting calls for tighter safety and subsequently drawing swift criticism from the local council.

City of Sydney Deputy Mayor Jess Miller plans to oppose the changes at Monday’s council meeting.

“This signifies a major step backwards in reviving the 24-hour economy and undermines the work of the City and the state to balance vibrancy and safety in a way that is reasonable,” said Miller.

The Marlborough, fondly known as the Marly, has been an Inner West landmark since 1860.

Owned by Solotel, it can house up to 1500 patrons on a busy night, making the Marlborough a major late-night venue whose restrictions could ripple through Newtown nightlife.

Police reported more than 90 incidents at or near the pub over five years, including assaults, drink-spiking, and clashes with officers.

The venue has already introduced measures such as body-worn cameras for some security staff and relocating the main entrance.

But police say these have “had minimal impact on reducing the frequency of alcohol-related incidents.”

Proposed restrictions would see daily facial recognition scanning after 9pm, uniformed security patrolling dance floors and the beer garden, extra RSA marshals on duty, alcohol restriction after midnight, and caps on dance floor density to one person per square metre.

In September, Inner West area police command formally asked the NSW Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority to tighten the Marlborough’s liquor licence, citing “ongoing compliance issues” and a “significant risk to public safety.”

But councillors pushed back, calling the police figures “misleading.” According to the venue’s own analysis, as per SMH, nearly half the reported incidents were withdrawn or never proceeded.

“Incidents at the Marly have dropped from 25 in 2023 to just seven last year, and staff turned away more than 1800 patrons trying to get in,” the submission noted.

In their draft submission, councillors also urged the liquor authority to reject the conditions in their current form, describing the Marlborough as a “safe, well-managed venue,” in Newtown.

Miller said, “The number of incidents that the police have highlighted alone does not reflect the proactive measures that the venue takes in preventing and managing the patrons. It also does not take into account the size of the venue, the key location on King Street or the fact that it is usually the latest trading venue in the precinct with entertainment and dancing.”

Beyond citing the conditions as “disproportionate, privacy-invasive, and directly contrary to the NSW government’s policy direction toward targeted, risk-based regulation and a thriving 24-hour economy,” councillors also flagged privacy concerns.

They warned that facial recognition would be an “extraordinary intrusion into personal privacy” and could scare off patrons.

They added that the combined restrictions would make late-night trading commercially unviable.

NSW Music and Night-time Economy Minister John Graham said: “Any progress we make unlocking the night-time economy cannot come at the expense of safety.”

He added that, compared to the lockout era, there is now less of a blanket approach and better processes for resolving issues at individual venues.

Liberal councillor Lyndon Gannon also weighed in, noting, “Policing is a hard enough job, but no one is suggesting our collective ambition for Sydney is to go back to pre-lockout law days. That’s not going to happen.”

The NSW Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority will now review submissions before deciding on the conditions.

Comments are closed.