
NSW Police Drop Anti-Riot Powers Charge Against Hannah Thomas
NSW Police have dropped a charge against Pro-Palestine protester Hannah Thomas that relied on rarely used emergency anti-riot powers.
The 35-year-old was one of five arrested in protest on June 27 during an early morning picket outside SEC Plating in Belmore. The business is allegedly involved in providing plating services for parts used in Israel’s F-35 jets, however the company denies this claim.
Thomas was charged with resisting police and refusing or failing to comply with a direction to disperse, with arrest documents for the latter charge citing emergency police powers under part 6A of the Law Enforcement Powers and Responsibilities Act (Lepra).
The powers were introduced following the 2005 Cronulla Riots to “assist police to prevent and defuse large-scale public disorder”, and can only be used after an authorisation is given by an Assistant Commissioner or above of the NSW Police.
On Monday afternoon, NSW Police announced they would withdraw the relevant charge, and that Thomas would face an additional charge of refusing or failing to comply with a direction – alongside her charge of resisting police.
Assistant Commissioner Brett McFadden said a review had been launched last Monday, 30 June, to examine and reassess the relevancy of the charges, as was expected in protocol for critical incidents.
“At the next court appearance, police will seek to withdraw the alternative charge under section 87ma(4),” he said.
“As the matter is before the court and subject to a critical incident investigation oversighted by Lecc, we are unable to provide further information.”
Emergency anti-riot powers “revealing and deeply concerning”
Yesterday morning, prior to the change in charges, Greens MP and Spokesperson for Justice, Sue Higginson filed a formal complaint to the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission (LECC), alleging misconduct by police officers involved in the arrests, and questioning the use of emergency powers invoked in Thomas’ arrest documents.
“The appearance of these emergency powers on the arrest documents for Hannah Thomas is very revealing and deeply concerning, considering that an Assistant Commissioner or above must have authorised their use and that they must have believed that a large-scale public disorder was about to take place,” she said.



